Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pärnu City Orchestra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Pärnu Concert Hall. Spartaz Humbug! 05:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Pärnu City Orchestra

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nothing I can find that suggests this is notable. The only link from our friends on the page on et.wiki here that seems relevant is this one which would not appear to be enough to meet the WP:GNG on en.wiki JMWt (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music and Estonia. JMWt (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * merge into Pärnu Concert Hall because it, as well as et:Pärnu Linnaorkester, do have refs (but probably not enough for WP:GNG now). - Altenmann >talk 18:25, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:ANYBIO ("has an entry in a country's standard national biographical dictionary"). —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 01:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a policy about individuals. JMWt (talk) 05:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * This is an organization of individuals and, according to my interpretation, would still qualify to remain. I agree that this article's reliance on a single source is a problem. I don't know Estonian, but searches in English and Russian turn up nothing useful. If that one source had come from elsewhere (e.g. personal website, blog, artists agency, minor Estonian publication, etc.), I would've been strongly in favor of deletion. However, it is cited in a national directory and with a sizable entry at that. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 17:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * That's all your opinion, which you are entitled to. However you can't point to a notability policy about *individuals* and use it to claim that an *organisation* is notable. That's not how it works. JMWt (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for telling me how it works. Article still gets a "keep" from me based on criteria 1 and 10 of WP:MUSICBIO. According to the entry in the EMIC database, they re-recorded Eino Tamberg's score for Pimedad aknad (television series) (Dark Windows), a late 1960s television series that was restored in 2007. In addition, I have found coverage from Sirp, an arts magazine published by the Estonian Ministry of Culture, and MuusikaPlaneet, a website that covers Estonian music. These will be included in the article shortly. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:43, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge orchestras are usually notable, but here no sources are available at all. BoraVoro (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.