Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Péter Kollár


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Péter Kollár

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. Beano (talk) 09:20, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

No savvy, what's got him? Doncsecz (talk) 09:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You mean, not notable enough? SyP (talk) 09:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Unknown? In Slovenia and Hungary found sources, and to top it all Kollár's works was out in printing. Doncsecz (talk) 09:59, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The article can and should be improved, but we should keep it.--Szilas (talk) 11:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Why do you think that the notability is correlated with the number of English-language sources? --Hkoala (talk) 11:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree with the others. This way you could delete a relatively high percentage of the wikipedia articles. Keep it.Carlos72 (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

By the way check this one Isaiah Dorman. I do not think this person is notable enough, but I think this article should not be deleted either.Carlos72 (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Appears not to pass WP:BIO, and the arguments for keeping are fairly nonsensical. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, he is a published author (from the 19th century, when, unlike today, not everyone got published). Don't let the article be the victim of an "Americans don't know him, therefore he doesn't exist"-style argument. – Alensha   talk  14:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep --Zimmy (talk) 17:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:BIO ("The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field"), Starblind you should check the external sources. --grin &#9998; 19:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep the sources seem to be adequate. Adam78 (talk) 20:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per grin. --Hkoala (talk) 16:04, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Carlos72 (talk) 22:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep --Burrows (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.