Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Péter Tóth (pianist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) NuclearWarfare  contact me My work  20:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Peter Toth, Hungarian pianist

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet WP:BIO, no sources or references. After further reading, it seems the article is a bio of the user who created it. cf38 talk  10:18, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep. Article claims "winner of the International Piano Competitions in Wittenberg (1997), Bovino (1998), Franz Liszt International Competition in Weimar (2000) and in Budapest (2001)". This easily satisfies the bio requirements for WP:MUSIC. Some references would be nice. VG &#x260E; 10:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources have been added to substantiate some of the claims for awards, so a definite keep. VG &#x260E; 21:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 10:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 10:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Article needs to be renamed to Peter Toth (pianist) comply with guidelines on disambiguation. Can we source the awards? -- neon white talk 11:52, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep if sourced. besides the contests, there's the prize for one of his recordings. Fully sufficient for notability. Doesnt matter who created it, if he';s notable. But it does need some source for verification. DGG (talk) 03:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Article rewritten. -- Banj e  b oi   18:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. Certainly notable and sourceable. -- Banj e  b oi   18:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This one seems to be a keep. Stifle (talk) 20:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.