Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P-Funk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments czar  16:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

P-Funk
"Withdrawn by nominator" per Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion--Coin945 (talk) 14:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dubious music genre article. Coin945 (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep I could tell immediately that the nomination of trad jazz was absurd but I'd not heard of of P-Funk. But a search soon finds a book on the topic: George Clinton & The Cosmic Odyssey of the P-Funk Empire and so there's obviously something to this.  This deletion spree doesn't seem to have done due diligence and AFD is not cleanup. Andrew D. (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Pretty much all of these articles have been lying dormant for years. Some of them may end up being notable after a deep Google search, but it is a case-by-case basis. Wikipedia cannot just assume an article is notable because it has existed here for many years. It needs concrete sources and information. FWIW, you are right, AFD isn't a cleanup. But it does help your argument.--Coin945 (talk) 13:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep the nom just went on a massive drive-by afd splurge, did zero background work. Semitransgenic  talk. 14:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.