Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P. Shane Mitchell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 15:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

P. Shane Mitchell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN performer/director/playwright. Active primarily in Alaska with minor local coverage through play reviews in the local paper. Ref #1 (Anchorage Press) review mentions he is the director. Ref #2 is a dead link. Ref #3 doesn't mention him. Ref #4 (Anchorage Daily News) about two short plays entered in a competition. One is by the subject. About five sentences are about Mitchell. The Wikipedia article mentions some obscure awards that are included in the Pioneer Drama Service external link. There is this Prince William Sound College conference which list him as receiving an award in 2010. I found nothing additional in searches that was helpful. Mostly different people with the same name. Not enough coverage for WP:N. Doesn't satisfy WP:ANYBIO or WP:CREATIVE. Gab4gab (talk) 20:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Strong keep I know, you know but I got to say I have a very strong feeling this guy is notable, if it has nothing to do with theater. For what it's worth, I'll put a "I'm on it, I'll get to it" on making necessary improvements on this article per WP:WHOAUPNELLY. ""There are various reasons why one cannot immediately edit one or more pages as they should be in order to enable it to meet certain standards, or even to prevent it from being deleted. If an editor states his/her intentions to make some improvement, but that more time is needed for any reason, this should very much be respected."" If you need a reason, for starters I think this has all the makings of one of the finest articles on Wikipedia. And watch out for that guy with the NAAK injector. He's not the only one doing it, either. Better get yourself some kevlar shorts! Keep your back to a wall. - 55378008a (talk) 09:58, 6 January 2017 (UTC) User has been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits--Calton | Talk 06:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete.  If an editor states his/her intentions to make some improvement, but that more time is needed for any reason, this should very much be respected I tagged this article eight years ago for notability concerns, and it hasn't really improved. That's because he's not notable, even going by the very thin sources used to inflate his resume, so another eight years isn't going to help. --Calton | Talk 05:34, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Meh. I don't see how he's notable, but please fill it in. Bearian (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Cannot find reliable sourcing to satisfy WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 13:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find anything online to pass WP:BASIC or WP:GNG. TheMagikCow (talk) 07:21, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.