Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P54C 90 MHz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Eugene van der Pijll 11:40, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

P54C 90 MHz
Irrelevant. Mention CPU speeds in Pentium article if desired/useful. Groeck 04:20, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge Wikipedia is not paper. Roodog2k (talk) 15:03, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Pentium. Andrew pmk | Talk 17:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's no information here, let alone any that's worth keeping, and no one's going to search for it. -- Plutor 17:50, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete No additional necessary info.Amren (talk) 20:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as having no content. It's not an article.  It's a single fact.  If it's just a predicate nominative, it's not an article.  There's nothing to merge.  If "merge" voters are saying, "Someone mention that the P54C was a 90 MHz chip in the Pentium article," then, sure, that's good advice, but an article?  An article saying that one sentence?  No.  Geogre 21:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Currently content-free, but this IS the Pentium that had the famous floating point bug, and as such is vaguely notable. Rsynnott 00:44, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The Pentium FDIV bug is fully described in Pentium, and applied to more than just this particular processor; the CPU speeds are already mentioned in Pentium; and this title is one particular clock speed and one particular model of the processor, out of many possibly combinations. There's nothing to merge, Pentium already covering this ground and a whole lot more.  I'm not convinced that a redirect would be useful, given the highly specific title. Delete. Uncle G 05:07, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't merge as suggested by Uncle G. Vegaswikian 05:50, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. CPU-cruft. / Peter Isotalo 03:41, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Geogre and Uncle G. Quale 07:19, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G— enceph alon  11:12, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.