Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAJAM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Nom withdrew. SynergeticMaggot 05:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

PAJAM
Vanispamcruftisement Xrblsnggt 02:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per rewrite --Xrblsnggt 01:45, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Gazpacho 03:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm unable to discern any notabilty after sifting through the adspeak. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per rewrite. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Keep per rewrite. Viridae Talk 04:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Viridae et al. 24.126.199.129 07:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I took an axe to the adspeak, and what's left is an article about a notable songwriting and production team. I think the article should be kept. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC) Comment: And I added some external references which establish verifiability and notability. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as stubified. --Dhartung | Talk 07:19, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep —  Notability asserted by the fact that they have worked with artists who are notable enough to be on WP. M  a  rtinp23  10:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the rewrite   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  12:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The rewritten stub seems notable, verifiable, and objective.  Smerdis of Tlön 13:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Martinp23. It just needs a little expansion. Lau  ren  22:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep the new version. - Richardcavell 23:14, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.