Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAKISTANI BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was -- Delete - Longhair 12:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

PAKISTANI BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC MAGAZINES AND JOURNALS
Text dump of some essay/newspaper article, possible copyright violation. Previously deleted by WP:PROD. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 17:35, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * User:Makemi's reason for deletion was: "Looks like a textdump of a paper, original research, uses Wikipedia as a source, which is bad form." - Mike Rosoft 17:41, 20 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I agree it's probably a copyvio. Mak (talk)  17:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a repost of previously-deleted material (as this was taken down three days ago). I don't know why you didn't just tag it for deletion as opposed to bringing it to AfD, Mike Rosoft (man, what a name!). If this isn't speedied, then obviously, it's a clear-cut delete. -- Kicking222 17:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * An article which was deleted by "proposed deletion" and re-created is NOT a candidate for speedy deletion. Please read WP:PROD. - Mike Rosoft 18:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: definately a copyvio from somewhere. --Hetar 20:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 23:44, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nacon kantari  17:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOR. Probable copyvio. Also see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Faryal. Stifle (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.