Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PARCS (radar)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to  Cavalier Air Force Station. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

PARCS (radar)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very little links to it, badly rewritten and entirely unsourced. Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 18:14, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. Possibly notable, but unsourced and few internal links.   IShadowed  ✰  21:41, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: This google search produced a few hits, some of which might be able to be used as sources if someone was keen to try to improve the article. Some of them are just wiki pages, but others might be useable. Neutral on keep or delete. — AustralianRupert (talk) 21:44, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, the subject of the article appears to have sufficient coverage to meet notability. That being said, the article needs great improvement, least it be merged into Cavalier Air Force Station. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to CAFS until there's enough content for a separate article - no prejudice on recreation when it's expanded. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into Cavalier Air Force Station but not delete. Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.