Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAREF Woodrose School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Parents for Education Foundation as an WP:ATD. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 09:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

PAREF Woodrose School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. The article violates WP:OR and WP:PROMOTION. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES states that "Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 08:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 08:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 08:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 08:54, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep:The references are underdeveloped, but the well-developed text shows that is a temporary omission. I note a slew of similar deletions of well developed articles. WP:AGF applies. This applies to all PAREF schools.ClemRutter (talk) 08:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * How is this is "well-developed"? WP:AGF has no match with WP:GNG. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 15:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I looked into this and couldn't find anything that can be used to reference the material in the article. Which, while I agree there is "content", it does no good to have said content if none of it is referenced and therefore the article fails the notability guidelines. I'm more then happy to change my vote to keep if someone can provide WP:THREE reliable, in-depth sources so it will pass WP:NORG though. In the meantime, private schools are not inherently notable. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:32, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Parents for Education Foundation. Fails WP:NSCHOOL per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 09:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. VV 20:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.