Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PASKIBRA SMA Negeri 1 Slawi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deletion G11. (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

PASKIBRA SMA Negeri 1 Slawi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not in English (needs translation) and has no RS. Unknown if it is notable. Tyros1972 Talk 07:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep for 14 days, then delete if it hasn't been translated. New articles that aren't written in English are usually listed at Pages needing translation. When there has been no effort of translation after 14 days, such articles are prodded. The fact that the article is not in English is no reason to delete it. Unless the nominator can read Malay and can confirm that the content is non-notable, final assessment should be left to translators. Apparently there's no corresponding article at the Malay Wikipedia either so speedy deletion is also not warranted. De728631 (talk) 14:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I am guessing that this is one branch of a wider organisation - but it is just that, a guess, based on machine translation. The article is now listed on WP:PNT and as per De728631, that is the best place for dealing with it now, rather than AfD. AllyD (talk) 14:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No ref's, not in english why waste resources and time? Capitalismojo (talk) 15:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Because we don't speedily delete such articles. There's no such criterion for "No ref's, not in english". Either the subject is insignificant or it has already been covered elsewhere on the English WP, but for everything else there's always the option of improving the article. De728631 (talk) 16:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, Jimfbleak has now deleted the page as pure advertising. Case closed. De728631 (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.