Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAX-AM Digital Single No. 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ryan Adams. Spartaz Humbug! 11:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

PAX-AM Digital Single No. 1

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. No indication that this may meet WP:NSONGS, only reference is to sale site. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. RadioFan (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this single. Joe Chill (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Ryan Adams. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 20:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no reason for this article to be deleted - it is an official release from a successful musical artist. It just so happens to be released on his self-made label, PAX-AM, but this does not make it any less valid.

As for significant coverage:

News article from major music website Pitchfork.

News article from prominant music site Stereogum.

There is no reason for this article to be deleted. Egg_Creations (talk) 11:08, 18 September 2009

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Merge and redirect to Ryan Adams or an article created for PAX AM, citing the same sources. First, the sources make note of the new label, which happens to be making available digital singles. There is nothing inherently notable about the singles themselves. Second, naming the article PAX-AM Digital Single No. 1 for a single is like naming Doris Day's "Secret Love" Columbia Records 40108. The title of the A-side, according to Adams' website, is "Lost and Found". Recommend the same outcome for PAX-AM Digital Single No. 2. --Wolfer68 (talk) 01:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.