Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBM Products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

PBM Products

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability never established, article has been deleted twice in the past written like an advertisement KittenEnemy (talk) 18:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. All the references that aren't first-party are only brief mentions of the company. Also, the article seems to be more about the creator of the company rather than the company itself. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:54, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. If we want to build an encyclopedia and not a business directory, this is the kind of  business that never should be able to meet any reasonable notability standard: a manufacture of private label store brand infant formula.  In other words, its products will not be sold to the general public under its own brand.  They will be the store brand or generic versions sold under the names of the actual notable brands that label them.  The references are to routine coverage about non-historic litigation and about the founder's community boosterism.  They don't establish the notability of this business.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 19:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This is barely an article about PBM Products - it's more about Mr Manning. He appears to be 'notable' for founding PBM, which itself appears barely notable for apparently being the first producer of own-brand infant formula. Promotional in tone - sounds to be 'by' rather than 'about'. Peridon (talk) 20:08, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.