Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS idents (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion, not even from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

PBS idents
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * This nomination seems to have been malformed but I will go ahead and say Keep for the reasons well articulated at Articles for deletion/PBS idents (3rd nomination).--Arxiloxos (talk) 04:43, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Also, when this Afd closes, please protect Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS idents (5th nomination) from being created. Georgia guy (talk) 13:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Blocking the creation of the AfD nomination means that it'll have to WP:ANI in order to get deleted. If people want to put it up for nomination that's their choice.  Our responsibility is to swat down the nomination with why not. Hasteur (talk) 14:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I just feel that this article will just get more and more Afd's as months pass. Georgia guy (talk) 15:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep While the article does communicate the different states of the logo, it is a little bit long for the purpose  Hasteur (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasteur (talk • contribs) 18:32, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep CLG Wiki is a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.163.207 (talk) 02:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.