Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PB Radio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

PB Radio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minimally sourced article about a student radio station which aired only online and closed-circuit, and never had any class of conventional broadcast license at all — but online or CC stations do not get an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NMEDIA just for existing (only conventionally-licensed broadcast stations get that). It could qualify for an article if it could be reliably sourced over WP:GNG — but two of the three sources here are the station's own self-published content about itself, and the only independent source is a community weekly newspaper. That's not good enough. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Never seemed to get more than brief local coverage, and now that it's defunct, unlikely to get more, so not notable. --Slashme (talk) 07:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:50, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete While I don't think that local newspapers are per say bad sources for establishing notability in all contexts, I agree with the analysis here so far that it's insufficient to make the case for WP:GNG in this instance.  S n o w  let's rap 09:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.