Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCH Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. RRG


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:05, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

PCH Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. RRG

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company. All references are primary source except one (the Demotech link), which merely proves that the company exists. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:38, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable insurance company serving a very limited client base; such a business needs to have somehow come to the notice of the general public to be notable: a mutual insurance company owned by its policyholders who consist of owner/operators of assisted living facilities and personal care homes that serve senior citizens. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is a notable company being the ONLY company that offers insurance to personal care homes and assisted living facilities.  It is unique and known to the public and public-insureds.  It sounds to me that this article is very informative and gives proof of a unique INSURANCE company where insureds can make decisions on how the company is run. Also, it only looks like to me that there are more than 1 secondary sources.  Risk Retention Services is a database of many risk retention groups for example.  The only one that is directly related to PCH Mutual it appears is Personal Care & Assisted Living Insurance Center that appears to be a partner with them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.179.13 (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete Unfortunately, being unique does not make it notable in light of any significant coverage Corpx (talk) 17:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Even in this particular niche, cannot verify importance. Claims 1000 clients, but there are many more such facilities. The Risk Services ref is not independent--it's basically from an Insurance broker with whom they & other specialty firms have a business relationship. DGG (talk) 01:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.