Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCRL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (NAC) RMHED (talk) 17:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

PCRL

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non-notable pirate radio station Rapido (talk) 11:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as subject of article appears to meet both verifiability or notability thresholds with sustained in-depth coverage in multiple reliable third-party sources. While pirate radio stations are not granted the same general notability that a government-licensed broadcast radio station enjoys, there is nothing inherent to pirate radio station articles that demands that deletion as long as they meet WP:GNG. - Dravecky (talk) 06:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep PCRL is notable due to its strong links with the Handsworth riots, a period of civil disorder in the UK on a par with the Los Angeles riots. PCRL's notability stems from its own in-house news coverage and in-house appeals for calm. Although a well-known reggae/Caribbean music station in its own right, the focus of this article is on the station's more memorable connections to  civil unrest in Handsworth, Birmingham UK. Andrew Oakley (talk) 23:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - should the information therefore not be merged into one or other pages regarding the Handsworth riots then? Rapido (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep One of several articles about notable radio stations nominated by the same editors, possible WP:COI. -- Scarpy (talk) 06:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - if you could explain the correlation of an accusation of "conflict of interest" with whether an article should get a "keep" or not, it would be most appreciated. Because that doesn't justify the retention of an article. Rapido (talk) 10:24, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.