Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCSCHEMATIC A/S


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

PCSCHEMATIC A/S
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Company is not known for anything, and also fails WP:SOURCES. LAA Fan sign review 20:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:52, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete I saw some foreign-language hits on their software which would make me more hesitant to delete an article about their software, but nothing about the company itself. --Cyber cobra (talk) 01:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7 - this article about an organisation does not assert its notability. Also bearing in mind WP:BURDEN the article is completely unsourced and thereby fails WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't seem to find any reliable sources on the net for information about this company and no evidence of notability in 3rd party coverage. Ben Kidwell (talk) 22:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.