Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC Flame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:24, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

PC Flame
not a notable website; alexa rank of 682,281; fails WP:WEB -- zzuuzz (talk) 11:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I'd disagree. My site is growing very quickly, and with a Pagerank of 3, we'll soon be much larger. Please leave this. Would it help if I updated it w/ a list of our many backlinks? "The article itself must provide proof that its subject meets one of these criteria via inlined links or a "Reference" or "External link" section." Backlinks should be sufficient to meet the criteria, correct? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FPSDavid (talk • contribs) 2006-07-16 07:48:03 (UTC)


 * delete per nom. "growing very quickly" and "we'll soon be much larger" does not equal notability. At best, it could equal future notability, albeit that is unlikely. And millions of websites have lots of links to them, or have a pagerank of 3.... --SJK 11:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * yea but I have many higher PR backlinks, which equals alot of traffic, which means growing and higher PR soon. --FPSDavid 11:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing all aspects of WP:WEB. spamvertising is not what wikipedia is for --Peripitus (Talk) 12:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Peripitus. FPSDavid: In the future, a reasonable test for notability is if someone OTHER THAN YOU independantly thinks that your site is worth listing in an encyclopedia.  Whoring for traffic = article won't last long, and you likely won't get all that much from wikipedia in the first place.  -- &#91;User: Lesqual&#124;Lesqual] 13:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete spammerific --Xrblsnggt 14:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Charlesknight 14:37, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. As for the predictions that the site will grow quickly, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- Captain Disdain 15:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB, is likely WP:VSCA. -- Kinu t /c  17:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete treet. Danny Lilithborne 23:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.