Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC MD


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was deletion. RyanG e rbil10 (The people rejoice!) 05:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

PC MD
Advertisement and self promotion. Tagged with "prod" on 5/22/06; tag removed by IP user in the same region (Chicago) as the business is located. Diogenes00 00:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "more information will be added re benefits of home computer service" That's from his explanation for removing the prod. It's definetly just an ad. -Royalguard11Talk 01:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advertising for a particular product.  Decision tree diagnosis software isn't sold for a simple reason: it can kill people.  Geogre 02:24, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete adspam. -- MrDolomite | Talk 03:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you're suggesting this article be speedy deleted, it does not meet the criteria as explained here. But if you didn't mean it that way then ignore this comment. -- Tu s  pm (C 22:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Crossed out my comment because I now realize that the user did not mean "speedy deletion." -- Tu s  pm (C 22:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Based on Hoover's, they have 2 employees and annual sales of less than $100,000. Sounds like WP:CORP failure to me and a bit of WP:SPAM. -- Kinu  t /c  05:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as advertisement. Dark Shikari 17:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - non-notable. -- Big  top  ( tk | cb | em | ea ) 21:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely more of an ad than an encyclopedia article. -- Tu s  pm (C 22:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious self promotion. --angers 22:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and its a pity that the author didn't realize that expanding his advert wouldn't help make it into an article. KillerChihuahua?!? 22:57, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * speedy delete, no assertion of notability imho. ~  crazytales 56297   -talk- 18:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.