Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PDA Dimensions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While more input here would have been desirable, rough consensus (per low participation) in this short discussion is that article is not promotional in nature, which was the basis of the rationale for deletion. North America1000 07:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

PDA Dimensions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promo piece, . Speedy deletion template removed by the creator. Kavdiamanju (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I very much doubt that this is a promo piece, because the phone on which this software ran was discontinued over 20 years ago. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, I agree, the user Kavdiamanju is known to provide condescending and inappropriate (non-existant) justifications on most topics. It seems like the user Kavdiamanju does not take time to make a case of justification but merely sets new articles to AfD without reasoning. Kavdiamanju Please justify your clams, factually and not by emotional, unrelated verbs such as "salt and burn". Please provide an actual explanation with reason in at least one (full) sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serjinator (talk • contribs) 15:04, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note to Administrator - Serjinator may have an axe to grind with nom. See []. Although I disagree that this article should be deleted, User:Kavdiamanju stated his reason for deletion (Promo). The "salt and burn" comment is rather direct - I am assuming it is because the creator removed the CSD tag and has yet to make a justification either on the article's talk page or here.  CBS 527 Talk 17:07, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Please don't consider my comment as a "keep" opinion. It was simply an observation, and I haven't yet looked into whether I think this should be kept or deleted. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have never heard of promoting a product that was discontinued decades ago. The main product this company developed, DispatchIt, was important at the time of it's design and notable, as was the company. There are plenty of sources available on subject.  CBS 527 Talk 16:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.