Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEIMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

PEIMS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge to Texas Education Agency, for which it is the centralized database. Even if it were expanded beyond a stub, it doesn't seem to be independently notable, but it does get passing mentions, especially in the context of school and district performance ratings. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I also see no reason for merging. Most organisations will have internal reporting systems.  It's not something worth mentioning in an encyclopedia article unless there's somthing out of the ordinary about it's existence. -- Whpq (talk) 17:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.