Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEI Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, consensus is that the references identified here establish notability. Davewild (talk) 19:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

PEI Media

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY Hu12 (talk) 17:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — I had G11 speedied a previous revision. Despite spending some time searching online, I cannot find any sources that give significant coverage to this media group. EJF (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete by A7. I don't read anything in there that makes the subject important.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 22:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)  New comment below.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately its claim of being leading is enough for it to wriggle out of meeting A7, as it claims significance/notability. EJF (talk) 22:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The company's conferences and its PEI 50 list may be notable. A pension plan has a note on its site about being on the PEI 50 list: http://www.otpp.com/web/website.nsf/web/pei_award --Eastmain (talk) 23:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. When you search for the brand name Private Equity International, rather than the company name PEI Media, you get better results. The news references at http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Private+Equity+International%22 seem sufficient. --Eastmain (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Eastmain. GreenJoe 00:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The references provided by Eastmain seem pretty good.  It'd be nice if the article stated the full name more visibly, though.  --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep — references show it appears to be notable. EJF (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.