Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PGNx Media


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:39, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

PGNx Media

 * This article is about a website and does not provide any information as to why the subject matter is important. If its deleted, don't forget to remove all the redirects leading to it. Fil e  Éireann 22:12, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEB. Alexa rank over 600,000. From the article, it seems their best trait is that the site doesn't crash as much as it used to. Fan1967 22:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Do not delete:The website is included in Gamerankings.com as its scores counting for the overall aggregated score. Same for Metacritic.com, and Rottentomatoes.com.
 * The Alexa score is so low because the website no longer supports Alexa because of spyware.
 * A quick Google search shows that is is frequently linked to. Over 189,000 results.
 * It is no different than Advanced Media Network Thinkjose 22:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah 174,000 hits -- 13 of them unique. Call me a wee bit skeptical about the vailidity of that response. --Calton | Talk 08:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * this google search excludes the pgnx.net domain and there are still 129,000 results. Are you sure there are just 13 unique links? Because I'm counting more on the first page or two. Thinkjose 16:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Try clicking the little blue arrow pointing to the right at the the bottom of the page. Are you sure there are 129,000 results? Maybe the SEO thing ain't working out as well as you thought. --Calton | Talk 00:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:WEB. Tevildo 22:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If it's included in the industry's leading reviews compilation websites, how is the website not well known? If it is well known, it meets #3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thinkjose (talk • contribs)
 * Keep seems notable enough. Wikibout-Talk to me! 23:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of it being well known: quite the opposite, in fact, given the paucity of unique links. --Calton | Talk 08:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I hope you revise this after I showed you that there are over 129,000 links excluding the pgnx.net domain. There are link from hundreds of domains. Why are you so interested in this particular entry being removed? Thinkjose 16:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Why are you so interested in this particular entry NOT being removed? Hint: playing the paranoia card isn't particularly helpful to your cause.
 * Oh, and I reran the search, and I got 96 unique hits this time. STILL not even close. --Calton | Talk 00:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * So, basically you ran out of actual reasons so you've resorted to falsely accusing me? SEOs? 96 unique hits? Come on. It's included in various aggregation websites, it's quoted extensively, and it has been association with corporations such as Alienware. There are much worse entries Calton. Pick a better fight. Thinkjose 02:07, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. Fails WP:WEB Bwithh 16:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note Revised page to include more notability including affiliation with the world-renowned Wharton School. Thinkjose 21:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The site is definitely appears non-notable (as a site) but there are 998 mentions of it (mainly) on other gaming sites - on copied reviews. I.E. as the article claims it seems to have some importance as a syndicated review source.  Rich Farmbrough 08:34 28  June 2006 (GMT).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.