Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PG Paper Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

PG Paper Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about an unremarkable paper company written by undisclosed paid editors. No significant coverage; all refs are routine coverage of mundane business happenings. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment -- if this one sinks, a similar promotional article, Poonam Gupta, with a photo of the PG nameplate will live on. Common SPA editors. Rhadow (talk) 15:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  19:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete But after thisis deleted,I'll nominated the bio. The simultaneous editing of  articles on a firm and on its principal is a hallmark of promotionalism  DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as excluded by WP:NOTSPAM and a terms of use violation. Non-notable on top of that. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As an apparent violation of the terms of use, as spam, and as a non-notable company. AusLondonder (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.