Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PGi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – bradv 🍁  23:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

PGi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I was going to stub this to remove the G11 material, but a search revealed nothing more than Yahoo Finance and PR Newswire. I am unable to find independent, reliable sources coverage to meet WP:ORG. So rather than leave it as an A7, bringing it here for discussion Star   Mississippi  18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  18:15, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 20:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nom, nearly every reference is PR. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:27, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.