Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PHP vs ColdFusion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

PHP vs ColdFusion
del. Original research: chaotic comparison of two progr languages. mikka (t) 06:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Not too original, since I've done similar "research" in the past (though with a less neutral tone!). Anyway, it's not encyclopedia material; maybe something for Wikibooks. Delete. &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-12-06 06:53:44Z
 * Delete as unencyclopaedic. Its not original research though, and is quite correct.  I just don't see how we can justify having an article about the comparison of two programming languages.  If we did that, then we could keep going forever.  Its pointless. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 08:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unencyclopaedic, POV - and pointless, as Zordrac says. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 13:59, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: We have a number of articles comparing programming languages. See Category:Programming language comparison. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 22:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I am not a great believer in the cruft-justifies-morecruft idea :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 23:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * FYI, Comparison of C Sharp to Java survived an AfD debate. See Articles for deletion/Comparison of C Sharp to Java. There's no reason we can't keep this one if it's done better. Of course, PHP and ColdFusion are very dissimilar, meaning this article would be really long. At least C# and Java are pretty close. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 23:29, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.