Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIM Xtreme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

PIM Xtreme

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Schuym1 (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment This search reveals plenty of reliable sources. However, whether PIM Xtreme deserves a place in an encyclopedia is debatable. (It certainly is notable according to the notability guidelines.) Anti  venin  16:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Those reliable sources don't have significant coverage and most of them are download sites. Schuym1 (talk) 16:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:05, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as with many other software articles, this one lacks the necessary real-world discussion of the program in third-party sources. Themfromspace (talk) 03:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment This software is notable according to the web presence, activity and people acceptance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.0.195.143 (talk) 13:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment On Wikipedia, notability is defined by the notability guidelines. Your vague assertion of notability isn't enough, as the article's subject needs to be covered non-trivially by independant, third-party sources. Themfromspace (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.