Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PIPC Management Consultancy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Chetblong T C 02:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

PIPC Management Consultancy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nn company fails WP:CORP, numerous papers, magazines, etc., have a "fastest growing" list for various industry niches, placing on one is not a notable achievement as they are more subjectively based than objectively based - hence different companies make similar lists from different sources. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The Fasttrack 100 is an completely independent and objective review. Those companies listed require formal audit to acheive listing and indee this is a notable acheivement Moreover this is the 2nd year running this company has made this listing. User:Comerfordj —Preceding comment was added at 16:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Essentially unreferenced article about a non-consumer consulting services firm.  This sort of business needs a fairly strong showing of notability.  Being listed in a directory does not meet the business notability guidelines.  Text is strongly non-neutral in tone: known for its expertise in project and program management, (t)he market demanded management consultants that could focus on ‘delivery and execution’ . . .  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 21:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Carlossuarez46: I'm not seeing any sign of notice or impact outside of a very narrow range -- and I'm not sure about those, either. --Calton | Talk 01:27, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just does nto appear notable to me. - TexasAndroid (talk) 21:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete - listing in the Fasttrack 100 is certainly notable. Indeed, the Fasttrack 100 is also listed in Wikipedia (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunday_Times_Fast_Track_100). I note that PIPC are listed here and indeed were listed in 2006. Could I suggest PIPC update the article to remove any 'non-neutral' text. User:Samsonthomas  — Samsonthomas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.   This is it, in fact. —Preceding comment was added at 07:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Listing in the Fasttrack 100 means, well, a listing in the Fasttrack 100, and that's pretty much it. --Calton | Talk 13:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.