Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PNOZ (safety relay)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  10:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

PNOZ (safety relay)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Various non-notable products and trademarks of Pilz (company). No shred of third-party coverage; even the replies to forum questions on whether the CMSE degree is recognized internationally were written by Pilz. Huon (talk) 14:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC) Huon (talk) 14:12, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Third-party sources added. Safety-Hero 16:49, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as commercial spam. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:00, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  ♔  04:40, 4 March 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete all - the "third party" sources aren't third party at all. Primary sources, sources published by the company itself, press releases and primary sources like patent documents and trademark registrations - none of those are significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The company, Pilz, might be notable but individual products probably aren't. Strongly suggest the author familiarises himself with Wikipedia's notability guidelines before creating any more articles. Stalwart 111  06:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete all  I think the company is notable -- the deWP article seems to be well established, but the individual products  are not individually notable on the available evidence .   DGG ( talk ) 01:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.