Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POLINCO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Keep. Deathphoenix ʕ 16:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

POLINCO
Not completely sure about this one, but here we go: Non-notable extreem right wing, Dutch web forum. The forum only has 513 members. However, this is the big "but", the forum did get some mention in the Dutch press as one of the on-line extreem right wing, Dutch web forums. -- Koffieyahoo 07:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep: I get 23k Google hits for this (although admittedly the first two aren't relevant). The article on nl.wikipedia (Dutch) was put up for deletion in April, but it looks like either the process was never fully carried out, or the template was never removed. In any case, their article is longer than ours (but not by much) and has some semblance of real information. I don't really know Dutch, but I can figure a little bit out because of its (written) similarity to German. But probably not enough to accurately bring information from their article to ours. Someone who reads Dutch could do that to better this article. - Che Nuevara:  Join  the   Revolution 10:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment clicing thought them I see that the hits come only from about 280 different websites, about 20% of which I guesstimate is in polish or some language that looks like portuguese to me (definitely not related to the polinco.net we're dicussing here) or it refers to polinco.com (another site) -- Koffieyahoo 13:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep if referenced. Appears to pass WP:WEB if it's been written about in the mainstream Dutch media. Tevildo 11:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment yeah, so mostly in a "one of a few scenarion". -- Koffieyahoo 13:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep someone who understands Dutch should translate nl.wikipedia article. -- Emc² ( CONTACT ME ) 13:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I wouldn't call the Dutch version completely NPOV, except for the Controversy section (Controverse). The first part goes in the direction of the article under discussion here, which form a Dutch point of view, isn't exactly NPOV either. -- Koffieyahoo 13:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete NN: "Onderwerpen: 6,034, Berichten: 35,958, Leden: 605" --Macarion 17:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.