Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POSSE Reading


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:25, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

POSSE Reading

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Another editor attempted to nominate this article for AfD, but failed to complete the nomination. This is an article about a reading strategy with only vague sourcing and general unclarity. It may well be possible to improve the article to a level of quality that would warrant keeping it, but I would recommend deletion based on the article's current content. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete --Phoon (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. It is a sign of the decline of generations, that people now imagine that the invention of an acronym is an adequate substitute for insight: Posse stands for predict organize search for structure summarize evaluate.  At any rate, Google News returns no relevant hits, and Google Scholar only works from one of the authors. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.