Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PPAIF


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

PPAIF

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This term is a neologism. The reference given describes a campaign to have the term 'listed in the dictionary'. There is no evidence that this term has achieved widespread use. Richard Cavell (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as a neologism. Mangoe (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the term gets only 289 Google Hits (many non-relevant), for even a relatively infrequently used non-notable 'internet slang' word many thousands of hits is not unreasonable. It seems to have originated just recently from myopenforum.com. No coverage in reliable sources, no assertion of notability. Icewedge (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete attempt at a forced meme. JuJube (talk) 07:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per meme fail. JBsupreme (talk) 07:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.