Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRABHAT KUMAR MUKUND


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 06:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

PRABHAT KUMAR MUKUND

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Hagiography initially created by a COI account. Despite warnings not to remove my blp prod, since there are no sources, and chiding that the ridiculous amount of praise is excessive, my attempts to keep this limited are being reverted. He's a politician, we don't even know what office he holds, but this article is ridiculous. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 03:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if the WP:BLPPROD tag is removed, the policy still applies. I have re-added the tag to the page. Yunshui 雲水 09:21, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as blatant advertising. Even if this subject is notable, I would rather do a rewrite with a blank slate; this article is completely irretrievable in its existing form, and should really be speedied. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい )
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Poorly written, advertizment. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete failing WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. From the sources I can find, I can only confirm that he is a Congress party politician. No evidence that he has ever been an office holder. No in-depth coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Sources have now been added to the article, so farewell BLPPROD. However:
 * 1 doesn't mention Prabhat Kumar Mukund at all.
 * 2 is another source which doesn't mention Prabhat Kumar Mukund. At all.
 * 3 is a dead link, and the Hindustan Times does not have an article with that title in its archives.
 * 4 again, doesn't mention the guy at all.
 * In other words, none of these sources pass either WP:NOTE or WP:V. It also may be worth noting that article creator User:Congresscommittee appears to be socking to circumvent a username block. Yunshui 雲水 08:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Precious little mention of this man on the web through Find Sources temp added in the Talk Page of this travesty of an article. All I can find is that he is mentioned in The Times of India as one of a number of congressman who demanded that stagnant water be removed from fields. This does not add up to significant coverage under WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG guidelines. Acabashi (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.