Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRECISACOL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

PRECISACOL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While I am not an expert on Bridge, this convention has only been devised recenetly, and to quote the article itself "The system has not been acknowledged by the World Bridge Federation yet, and effectiveness has to be proven still." Travelbird (talk) 06:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment by article creator There are countless bridge systems that have been devised and not been acknowledged by the world bridge federation, yet they are being played nonetheless (e.g. club tournaments). Wether or not all of these systems make a valid entry for Wikipedia or not, should not be judged by the fact if it is (not yet) acknowledged by an organization that speaks on behalf of a huge population for reasons being obvious. The article does indeed state that effectiveness has to be proven yet, but that does not make it an ineffective system before anything is proven. Fact remains that this system is played and that according to the players themselves, the system has more advantages than disadvantages

Precisacol1988 (talk) 07:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

"Dear Sir,
 * Additional comment by article creator EDIT: I have received a mail from the World Bridge Federation.

The World Bridge Federation does not endorse or acknowledge bridge systems. Players at WBF events are free to choose their own system, within specific parameters according to the event, details of which can be found in the WBF Systems Policy (http://www.ecatsbridge.com/documents/files/WBFInformation/policies-regulations/WBFSystemsPolicy.pdf )

Best regards Anna"

Precisacol1988 (talk) 09:27, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Promotional article for a non-notable topic created by a promotional user name representing a group (which I have reported). AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:02, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note User:Precisacol1988 has been perma-blocked as promotional. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete Absolutely non notable. A case could be made for CSD G11 here as well. Safiel (talk) 03:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.