Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PROFESSION VS COMFORT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Snowballed. An essay which WP:OR issues. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 15:00, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

PROFESSION VS COMFORT

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Reads like a personal essay, WP:OR, WP:SYNTH to me. Completely unreferenced, and no notability shown. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  13:28, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - concur, and the article appears to be a cut and paste from an article or essay somewhere else. (GregJackP (talk) 13:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete it's an essay based on someone's personal philosophy. Mandsford (talk) 13:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination; also apparently addressed to a "professional organization" with employees: The terms profession and comfort are connected to each other. Without one another is incomplete. It is more likely life without food or water. If someone tries to imagine any professional organisation where its employees interests are not preserved then it can be said that such organisation will not sustain with success., in either way any professional organisation where its employees are only busy with their comfort, leaving behind the professional activities then it also can be said that such organisation will not sustain with success and reputation. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete corporate motivation should be hosted on their own websites.Slatersteven (talk) 14:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.