Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PS, I Love You


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus default to keep. - ulayiti (talk)  00:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

PS, I Love You
The book itself doesn't seem notable enough, but the author is. Suggest redirect. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  18:09, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Then why not just do that? No need for deletion. Trollderella 18:34, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * For a couple reasons, chief among them the fact that I'm no expert in Irish literature. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  18:44, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * ^Delete but if anyone wants to merge it, note that the author's name is Cecelia Ahern but the wiki article is Cecilia Ahern - so a new article should be created and a redirect ledt in place. No literary expertise is needed, just cut and paste a few sentences.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  19:05, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * For the record, contrary to what the above might suggest, the cure for a misnamed article is not a new article, but A Move (Rename) operation, which has now been done producing Cecelia Ahern in place of Cecilia Ahern (and the with a free redirect is free , distinct from the one mentioned by DL above). --Jerzy•t 19:56 &20:03, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup, that's the right way to do it.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  21:13, 1 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete in concurrence with Dl yo ns 493 .--Isotope23 19:18, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, book by notable author. Kappa 19:32, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Non-argument. Notable authors often write non-notable books. --Jerzy•t 19:56, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge content to author's article. Saberwyn 22:13, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge the content into the authors page if there is anything worth salvaging. Stu 22:29, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge per above. Dottore So 22:31, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep To my generation, this is notable. Approximately half of my kindergarten class had this book; it was very popular. And every year throughout high school and college, someone's mom or dad has reprinted a section of this in the back of the yearbook after buying the space. Jacqui  ★ 04:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC) LOL well it looks like I jumped the gun. Sorry! Apparently there's more than one book by that name! Further research includes a lot of stuff. And the one I was speaking of wasn't this one.  Jacqui  ★ 04:29, 3 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.