Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSNext


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 21:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

PSNext

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software product, article written by SPA. Haakon (talk) 17:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Haakon (talk) 17:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 18:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - article does not assert notability. Significant coverage would not justify the article unless it asserted the notability of the subject.  (See WP:EXIST and WP:MILL). - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sorry to answer the notability and coverage questions, a quick search of google will net a Reuters article that is a reproduction of a press release from Business Wire about PSNext which should meet both Notability and coverage as mentioned unless having press releases being carried by 2 major international publications is not notable or significant.Chuglur (talk) 07:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Press releases don't normally meet the "Independent of the subject" part of the notability guideline. Spiesr (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Very Weak Keep: Press releases. - Ret.Prof (talk) 01:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete press releases don't count towards meeting the notability guidelines as they aren't independant of the subject. We need independant sources for reliable verification.  Them From  Space  02:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, non-consumer software. Only a handful of such packages, if that many, will ever be worthy of encyclopedia articles.  This isn't one of those. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can find no independent coverage by reliable sources which could establish the topic's notability. Self-publicity does not confer notability. Guest9999 (talk) 20:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.