Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PURISTA Mojito Blackberry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted all WP:CSD, author requested deletion, by Alexf. Non-admin closure JohnCD (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

PURISTA Mojito Blackberry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Over the last few days has introduced a string of articles about the PURISTA brand of drinks, James Glasscock, President and CEO of the company that produces them, and now these three articles about individual drinks. There seems to be a COI here. PURISTA and Mr. Glasscock may possibly be notable enough for articles, but these three articles are pure SPAM. Wikipedia is not an advertisement hoarding. Delete all. JohnCD (talk) 14:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi John, thanks for your message. I am completely fine with deleting the above articles. My goal was not to create advertisements, but rather informative, fact-based descriptions of new beverages on the market. To be fair, they probably do not deserve their own pages. I apologize if these crossed any Wikipedia boundaries, as I am still learning the process. I can assure you that James Glasscock and PURISTA are Wiki-worthy and have been mentioned in press, online, and media outlets across the US. (Zepolekim (talk) 18:18, 22 August 2009 (UTC))


 * Speedy Delete - I agree with the nominator and with Zepolekim about the three nominated articles failing inclusion requirements (and the other two being actually notable). Since the author agrees with the deletion, why not simply apply G7 speedy deletion (author requests deletion)? --  At am a  頭 19:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your input and advice regarding the PURISTA Caipirinha, Margarita, and Blackberry pages. I went ahead and author-deleted them. Best regards. (Zepolekim (talk) 19:30, 24 August 2009 (UTC))
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.