Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P Jainulabdeen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Editors were unable to find sources they felt evidenced notability under WP:GNG j⚛e deckertalk 21:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

P Jainulabdeen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet wiki:GNG criteria, also a recreation of already deleted article, notability is in doubt as most of the references are linked to personnel page Shrikanthv (talk) 10:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: references not in English, no verifiability. — Zujine |talk 14:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Sources do not have to be in English. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Google News archives found three English sources here (claims that his group, TNTJ, is the most powerful movement of Tamil Nadu but this is the only source I have found), here, here and here. Using the Tamil name that the article lists, I searched Google Tamil News and it provided one result but, due to the alphabetic differences, all the content never appears properly. It is possible that additional sources may not be English and Internet-based. There are insufficient sources at this time. SwisterTwister   talk  23:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of notable sources. Jason from nyc (talk) 03:23, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete due to Lack of sources. You can safely assume that if english sources are not available online for a subject, tamil sources will also be not available online. Indian media is not matured. I am not voting based on assumption only, I have searched for sources in both languages, in vain -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 08:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Sources do not have to be online. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know that. I am ready to reconsider if someone cites a reliable offline source. -- Anbu121 ( talk me ) 08:42, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources under WP:GNG. A search turns up a passing mention of his arrest and some other minor things, but nothing beyond trivial coverage. I allow the possibility of other coverage existing in Tamil, but do not have the capacity to investigate that myself. --Batard0 (talk) 07:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.