Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P funk mothership


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was do not delete. If someone wants to redirect/merge, go ahead (as long as consensus exists on article's talk), that doesn't need afd to decide. Petros471 20:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

P funk mothership
Nonsense. Maybe notable (or not), but it'd need a ground-up rewrite. Prod removed. Fireplace 21:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (changed to Weak Keep) the mothership concept was pretty important in Parliament lore, and is central to (and on the cover of) their Mothership Connection album, one of the most important albums of its time. However, the current article is unencyclopedic and would need almost a complete rewrite to fix.  If anyone is up for doing just that, though, I'll happily change my vote to keep. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:43, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Updated vote after improvements by Drett. Still needs some sourcing and clarification though, especially statements like "However scientists from America's MIT and Europe's ESA have both observed a strong trend toward increasing world Funk levels..." Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to P-Funk mythology (which might also need a bit of re-writing). &mdash; Catherine\talk 23:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to P-Funk mythology as above. 205.157.110.11 08:42, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I contested the prod on this on the basis that I would fix it up a bit, and then I went to sleep (too funked out, I guess). I've made some changes: removed unnecessary superlatives, added qualifiers to indicate what is part of the mythology. What do youse think now? Drett 10:03, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment As someone completely unfamiliar with the genre, after reading the (revised) article I still have no idea what the mothership is supposed to be. Is it just a stage prop?  Does it belong in some narrative?  This is why it strikes me as needing a rewrite from a blank slate.  Fireplace 15:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply Hey, I've changed it a bit more. I thought it would need a rewrite from a blank slate too, but I think what is there can be worked into something good. It's a bit better now, but it needs some more about where it fits in the narrative. Drett 21:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.