Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paakaati Po


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Izno (talk) 03:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Paakaati Po

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There should not be articles for Malaysian Tamil films that have no reliable sources. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Hello user, I believe Malaysian Tamil language films article are very notable, as all of them are released nationwide in Malaysia, there are reliable sources, our local media have reportings about these films. It is not like student film, it is REAL theatrical films, no reason for not being notable. I feel terribly sad that you want to nominate the deletion of all these articles, most contributed by me. I believe all these can stay. And, the article is well-written and well-cited, plus with good formatting. Please reconsider and unnominate the deletion, thank you so much ;) User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM 04:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You must have known these films is very significant in my countries. Although those cited websites are not news website, they are still media website that reports, making these films notable. Meanwhile, these articles are shorter, BUT you may realized that they are really written properly.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. TamilMirchi (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Latest Please read the latest version, I have added sources from Varnam, Anegun, Raaga, the local media websites that brings reliable information. I removed Cinema.com.my and excessive Youtube reference // Added 1 external film review site // Added IMDB title, remove other external links --User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM)
 * Delete No reliable independent reviews. Fails WP:NFILM. As to the "Cinema.com" citation, that's a film database site which provides no indication that the film is notable, just that it exists.  The "Varnam" might be a reliable source, except that the article is just a notice that the film was released and that it has a trailer. Again, that doesn't prove the film is notable...only that the film exists.  Donaldd23 (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment still fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 18:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete- As per Donaldd23's first rationale above. Also, even the changes made fail to provide anything substantial to indicate notability. Infact, highly motivated creator LoveFromBJM's failed attempts at finding reliable, in-depth coverage for the film just goes to show that it just does not have the neccessary specs to statisfy WP:NFILM. Sunshine1191 (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM, which are the agreed guidelines for films Spiderone  15:53, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: We all should consider that this is a newly released, rising film in its genre. Instead of deleting the article, we should put tags to add more citations and reliable sources. Thanks. KesunyianAyam (talk) 13:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Have you got reliable sources to evidence that this is a rising film in its genre? The film was released about half a year ago but still doesn't seem to have even one single review about it. Spiderone  17:05, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: "May be a rising film in its genre" is a speculation, with clearly no hard proof to back it up. Wikipedia is NOT a crystal ball. The only fact here is that currently the article fails WP:NFILM. TheRedDomitor (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.