Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paanchi

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – NSR (talk) 06:12, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Paanchi
-- A dicdef, fits the Deletion policy criterion. (and I personally am not a deletionist) D. J. Bracey (talk) 20:06, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, wiktionary doesn't take "dicdefs" of people. Kappa 22:49, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This man was a king. Of a real, if now historical, nation. I can't see how that could fail any test for notability ever made. (And I am (sometimes) a deletionist.) Cleanup, sure, but really...  --Icelight 23:52, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I got this page confused with another; this doesn't need deletion; I got this confused with Foder article. Sorry.D. J. Bracey (talk) [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]] 00:10, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Addendum I cleaned it up; also wikified and created disambiguation. I am very sorry, this was a terrible mistake   May I take the VfD tag off?  If feel like a real idiot. D. J. Bracey (talk) [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]] 00:33, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems like it has potential. Trollderella 00:30, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Kings of current or historic nations are inherently notable in my view. Capitalistroadster 01:49, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per nom. -- DS1953 04:48, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.