Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PabloDraw (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 07:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

PabloDraw
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software, no reliable sources to be found. Previous discussion was "no-consensus", 2 years ago. Plenty of time for refs to be found, if they existed. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  13:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My mistake, 3 years ago. Time flies. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  13:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * While there is no deadline, an edited version of this article might be worth a mention in the ANSI art article. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My main reason for pointing out the date of the old AFD is that WP:NOTE wasn't a policy then. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  06:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable software, per WP:NOTE. Also, the trivia section was annoying, so I removed it. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I get 2,200+ gHits for the software. It seems to be worthy of a modest article like this. Tim Ross   (talk)  17:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 01:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, the application appears to be uniquely notable as a one-of-a-kind editing and collaboration tool. Would like to see better sourcing on this though.   coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  20:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  23:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.