Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pac-Pix

vaporware, not well explained. --Ianb 16:29, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * I've tried to clean this up a little bit, although it's still not great, and everything I wrote was inferred from the original article, screenshots, and reviews. 4570 hits on Google for this game, none of which appear to be wikipedia on the first page at least, and EB Games seems to be taking pre-orders for its release in 03/05. Perhaps a Keep or merge into Pac-man would be best? - RedWordSmith 18:34, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: A product of the future. When it is released, we might well want a mention of it somewhere.  As a breakout, it would be better on the WikiGames than in main space.  A simple, "This is a game, and here is how you play it" seems non-encyclopedic.  I appreciate the work gone into improving it, but the farther we get from GameFAQs, the better.  Geogre 18:44, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Game that hasn't even been released yet.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:12, 28 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Products need to be of exceptional promise/interest to merit an article before they exist. Average Earthman 01:10, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)