Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Union Club Punch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pacific-Union Club. What little content there was has been merged into the proposed target article and this will now become a redirect. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Pacific Union Club Punch

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

User:Th78blue requested a nomination at Teahouse. They described it as "this old stub that I really do not feel passes as notable". As the article only cites primary sources, there is no indication that WP:GNG is met. casualdejekyll 19:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  casualdejekyll  19:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect/merge to Pacific Union Club, nothing wrong with having this as a subsection in that article, might help the notability there. Oaktree b (talk) 19:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge Agree, this is fine information to merge into Pacific-Union Club, then redirect there. Dreamyshade (talk) 14:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge into Pacific-Union_Club. Kpddg  (talk)  14:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pacific-Union_Club. It doesn't matter if a redirect is left or not due to the similar search terms Jacona (talk) 12:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.