Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacifica Amour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Pacifica Amour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability isn’t established because topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject WP:GNG JaneciaTaylor (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. All of Hello Sailor's other albums have their own page. Why not this one as well? Ross Finlayson (talk) 23:55, 30 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete That's not a valid argument and does not address the nomination's claim that the subject is not notable. I looked into Last Chance to Dance and The Sailor Story, and am comfortable saying the only notability for some of the other albums (at least those two, assumedly more) comes from their apparent charting in NZ, per claim in the main Hello Sailor article. This one apparently didn't chart. Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:11, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.