Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Packer (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Packer (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While this page was undeleted by in April of 2015, I feel that the concerns he mentioned on the talk page (most especially notability) have not been adequately addressed since then. The only sources are tied to the developers (HashiCorp), and I was unable to find much in the way of potential sources that weren't.

My first thought would be a redirect to either Vagrant, as Packer is apparently closely tied to it functionality, or HashiCorp, perhaps with the addition there of a section on it. WikiPuppies bark dig 05:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I haven't got more reliable sources, but my consulting company has 3 top-25 web company clients using it now, so it's somewhat popular... Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:32, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

We're a top 10 Bank and we're using it. This is serious stuff. The debate needs to be clearer about why this is better than puppet and chef, because the debate often ends there. This page is essential. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.159.130.230 (talk) 09:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Who is "we" and which top 10 bank are you? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Oppose. This seems to be widely used. It is an important part of "infrastructure as code". Covered in this book: But that book *is* written by a Hashicorp employee. --146.140.210.15 (talk) 14:01, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC) I don't know what sort of clearer consensus we're going to get; reliable sources by WP standards in the DevOps tools area are difficult to find. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.