Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paco Bryant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Linuxbeak | Talk 00:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Paco Bryant
This page is one of a circular set of self-refential non-notable (low google hit count) bios, all of which have a family relationship and have been created in the last couple of weeks There's also a set of redirects for various forms of each of the names. Josh Parris # 07:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Lori Bryant-Woolridge Special:Whatlinkshere/Lori Bryant-Woolridge
 * Benjamin Bryant Special:Whatlinkshere/Benjamin Bryant
 * Paco Bryant Special:Whatlinkshere/Paco Bryant
 * Renee Bryant Special:Whatlinkshere/Renee Bryant
 * Delete NN. Including any redirects -- Egil 11:54, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.  Logophile 13:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the whole lot, unfortunately. It is my hope that  will continue their work here and continue to contribute to other existing articles as he or she holds the potential to become another great asset to Wikipedia.  Hall Monitor 17:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * To clarify, please delete the lot of Bryant articles noted above, the Lori Bryant-Woolridge article can be handled through the normal copyvio process. Hall Monitor 18:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as admirable for his service, but ultimately non-notable. Hall Monitor, Look at Lori Bryant-Woolridge before you call delete on the whole lot...  she appears to be somewhat notable, even if the rest are not.--Isotope23 18:12, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You are correct, please accept my humble apologies. I have started Lori Bryant-Woolridge/Temp to replace the copyvio.  Hall Monitor 18:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep vaguely noteable for his service and relation to clearly noteable Lori Bryant-Woolridge, but not enough to merit his own article. This should be incorporatd into either a Lori article, or one of the linked miliatary articles Ronald Collinson 22:05, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep as he is clearly the least notable of the Bryant entries. He has won a Bronze Star, which is admirable, but is not uncommon among veterans.  The only reason I don't recommend "delete" is that he is differentiated from other veterans as he was (is?) a member of the very famous 82nd Airborne, was featured in a book that is widely available by a very well-respected and widely-known author (just do a Google search for the book and/or the author), and is clearly part of a military family who could be considered notable for the fact that it is has "dynasty" qualities: both grandfathers are decorated Generals, as is the father, and he is a decorated veteran of a high-profile war featured in a major book.  Clearly, when taken in total, the family is certainly notable for their consistent multi-generational military achievements (many people are from "military" families, but very, very few, I suspect, consistently reach the general officer level).  If this entry is deleted, I would suggest keeping reference to same in the Albert Bryant Jr. and Renee Bryant entries. el_amante 19:56, 12 October 2005
 * May I also say that just because several notable family members are entered at one time and by one person does not mean that they are automatically vanity pages. On very rare occasions (and I think this is one of them) the individuals entered are actually notable for their own reasons.  I'm not sure that user25be isn't a relation, but while there are some traditional red-flags, close review shows that these people are largely notable. el_amante 19:56, 12 October 2005
 * Delete NN Josh Parris # 00:22, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.