Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padlist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 04:25, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Padlist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Zero independant coverage, not even passing mentions. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


 * delete WP:MILL. No indication of notability from secondary sources. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Could not find any significant coverage from independent, non-trivial sources. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RS. The only sources are cited to techwire and TheVerge types of unreliable websites. Bearian (talk) 21:21, 28 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.